High Street issues drag on for 7 years…

What is new in High Street?…

  • High Street has been closed for nearly 7 years. The last street in the city to get any attention.  (Have you considered that this is longer than World War 11 lasted).       As you know I consider that keeping this area un-repaired has been a deliberate strategy..   aimed to promote other areas of the city.   (What school did you go to??? she says cynically).
  • The re-opening of the “street” is “imminent”  – that is one lane only, one way.  It did not happen 3 weeks ago so “imminent” is as close as I can get.
  • The  “Billens building 2017” is nearly finished.  Looks good!  I will grab an up to date photo.IMG_20171003_122741207
  • The demolition of the back of the 8 units owned by Pebble’s Group was supposed to be “imminent” as well.  I am watching the grass grow as we speak.  There is a very serious risk that the frontages will collapse  when this demo gets underway, if they are not very, very careful. Hope they know what they are doing….


    Digger been idle since end of November.

  • I spotted the CCC was cruising the street at 9.00pm the other night looking at the roading needs.  lol.  I would just settle for a road, who cares if it has cobbles? That’s a luxury. Apparently they were planning on digging up the road as soon as the new tenants have moved in to the rebuilt Billens and Duncan’s units.  You get the picture new businesses/road works a Typical Christchurch scenario.  I think you have already heard me comment on the lack of care that has been taken over the existing tenants/businesses in the CBD, by the powers that be.  This has not changed.
  • Our new tenants moved in upstairs yesterday.  They are having trouble getting an internet/phone line.  We put all the cabling in place but apparently there is no fibre connections spare in St Asaph street.  ie not enough nodes???  Really????   The latest update is that they may end up on the copper line that I had to use in 2013 that Vodafone “cobbled” up for me.   (Took them 4 months if I remember rightly).
  • As of today I am officially unemployed.  Cardmakers is sold, Arts the printers is closed.
  • re our neighbours.  On the North side, nothing has happened.  Zilch, nada…. it was supposed to be containered off at the front, 3 high if I remember correctly.  It was supposed to have parts of it demolished, it was supposed to be strengthened.. etc.. How is it that a building owner can get away with doing NOTHING for 7 years with no penalties?    The law is an ass.   It is well and truly time this was sorted out by legislation.    Somebody help????  Anyone out there?   CCC won’t help, nor will  Regenerate or LINZ, The Local MP’s won’t/can’t help…  Megan woods, Ruth Dyson, Duncan Webb…   Suggestions welcomed.   I am giving serious consideration to the temporary prop that I put in 7 years ago to hold up the roof…. that must be due to fail by now… the floor is rotten, the walls are falling out,   don’t blame me if it happens!!!

Part of our back deck is inaccessible to our tenants.

  • Oh and one last thing.. We are going for code of Compliance in early January 2018.  Ye ha.   7 years work coming to fruition!  By the way we did our landscaping for the Resource consent last week.  That was a waste of effort.  All the plants were stolen overnight.  They did leave the planter box though.  I really do wonder about the consents processes, they are a bit silly!P1010488.JPG

ho ho it’s off to work I go,  got some cleaning out to do and some compliance paper work to sort….

Have a great Christmas and New year.


Duncan’s Building in High Street vs Digger…

High Street News Flash:

  • I have been told by a contractor that the street in front of the Duncan’s Buildings will be opened on Monday, one way.  I have had no notification of this from the CCC but I would consider that normal.  ie I do not expect communication at any level.  I have no idea what implications this will have for contractor parking in the area, which is quite frankly a nightmare.  The irony of this is that you will enter the street from Tuam Street, go around the block and end up on, you guessed it, Tuam Street.  Aren’t our roading engineers clever?
  • A digger has begun demolition off  8 of the Duncan’s  Units, leaving the frontage standing if they are lucky. I will grab some pix today.

Digger has arrived and begun the demo.

  • Did you know that  once these 8 units are down, the unit next to us at 141 High Street is probably one of the most damaged buildings left in the city.  It has no support for its frontage and the back of it is just as bad if not worse.  The floors are rotten, the roof leaks and is held up by a prop that we put in place in 2010.  We should have pulled it out long ago.  ….. that is tempting …..   And still LINZ and the City Council wait for the building owner to do something.  As far as I can see, the owner, who is in Christchurch at the moment I might add,  (back from his overseas paradise), comes to look at the building occasionally and gives the universal one fingered salute to the CCC.  The law is clearly an ass.

Just how long are they going to let this go on? Is 7 years long enough for one building owner to hold up redevelopment of an area.  Obviously not! This building is not unique in the street as you well know.


NB. collected some graffiti in the weekend. If the silly idiot that did this knew what was holding the bay window up he would be very afraid.


Part of our back deck is inaccessible to our tenants.


Hi ho, hi ho, I am off to clear out the factory, we have sold the last of the plant.  Transfer is on the 30 December.

By the way, the lack of care that the government/council has taken with the existing businesses remaining in the CBD and fringes is worrying.  The conclusion we have all reached is that they did not want us here.

One also wonders, at what point do they consider that the number of bars and cafes in the city is past saturation point?  I note that bars and cafes are colonizers in a disaster, the problem in the Christchurch CBD and fringes is that we show no signs of getting past this stage.  So one could say that the recovery phase has not even begun.  7 years on….

They do not talk about this either,  Close your eyes government, for this is getting comical!

How not to repair a Heritage Bulding in the Christchurch CBD… Dirty 30’s again….

What is new in High Street.

  • The Watson’s frontage has been purchased by Shaun Stockman.  An Excellent outcome for the street as he is a very proactive landowner, who has a flare with heritage buildings.  (Although, as you know, I hate just keeping the facades).  I know that the Watson’s Building had been strengthened pre-earthquakes.  So the question should be asked as to why is only the facade still standing?  Did CERA have another of their rushes of blood to the head?  Any one know or remember, or was it another case of an overzealous demo contractor? I will try to find out. Link Here: https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/98817606/facade-sells-at-auction-no-takers-for-dux-building
  • This is obviously still annoying me…. I see the “dirty 30 list” is rearing its ugly head again.  In the 6 months or so that the CCC has been pursuing the building owners on this list they have sorted out 3?  Really? ( I sorted one-off them for them, I might add.  So consider that 2.)  And you consider that a success? As a building owner still trapped in a street of “Dirty 30’s” I do not consider this a success.  In fact the words Dismal Failure spring to mind.  Link Here: https://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/99030236/action-taken-on-christchurchs-dirty-30-list   As you all know, I think that the legislation has let us down badly in this regard. The building owners in many cases have been negligent in their duties to the city.
  • We have now sold all of our plant.  The last of it will transfer in a few weeks to the new owner. We are pleased that we have sold the last of the gear to a local company.  We look forward to helping him get up and running and we hope he has as much fun with the “Cardmaker’s brand” as I have had in the last 20 years.  The factory is slowly emptying as we work our way through 50 years of stuff!  Jeepers we have found some treasures!
  • The demolition of the back of the Duncan’s buildings was supposed to happen a few weeks ago.  I do not know what the hold up has been.  There are multiple engineering issues with this demo.  I have some reservations about it.  One being how they will resolve the issue of the continuous facade and seismic gaps in the rebuild of the backs.  But what would I know.

    No Demo yet….

    Happy days… the sun is shining, the ground only shakes once in a while, I am in my new house, the garden is starting to look better and not working is really great…. May I cost the government a fortune in superannuation payments and health care…. I consider it revenge for the crappy treatment that they dished out to the small land owners in the city… but I would say that!!!

How not to repair a Heritage Building in the Christchurch CBD…Demolition..

What is new in High Street…

It took 4 hours to sort it with a digger…


But It took 7 years to get to this stage…



Locked up again, this time for a week!

All jokes aside, one would have to ask why it took nearly 7 years for the issue of 135 High Street to be resolved.

We asked for help numerous times:

  • The land owner- it was uninsured..
  • CERA (Govt)  The less said about these guys the better.
  • CCDU  (Govt)  -Waste of time…
  • DC Christchurch  (CCC)  -No money no power.
  • The CCC -They denied they had the power.
  • CCC Heritage….. Well meaning but toothless..
  • Lawyers…  $$$$
  • LINZ (Govt)  who are in charge of these things now (They Ducked for cover, no response…)
  • The Minister of Building and Construction Dr Nick Smith… (Govt) ( Not my problem he says…)

No One would or was willing to address the issue.

There is a much bigger picture here that needs to be addressed. Who in the future is going to make sure this situation does not occur again? Wellington it is your turn now, you too could face the same problem…

One Building owner should not be able to hod up progress in an area to the detriment of surrounding and functioning businesses.

Minister Nick Smith is plain WRONG.  This issue needs to be addressed, it is occurring all over the country as buildings are abandoned,  often demolition costs are exceeding the value of the land. So it is easier to walk away.

The legislation is patently flawed and I feel that the responsibility for this failure lies with the Minister, Nick Smith.  This situation has been an epic failure on his part.

It should never be allowed to occur again..

Whoops I forgot… I got another building just like this one on the other side.

The law is an ass…


ho hum… I would like to see the figures on the number of Business closures in the CHCH CBD in the last 7 years, and the figures for how many survived the quakes and the shambles that followed…

PS.  I have been told that our end of High Street is closed.  Has been for months.  That accounts for the parking problems I have been going on about.   I found out by accident.  NO ONE TOLD or asked me.  CCC another epic failure….



How not to repair a Heritage Building in the Christchurch CBD…The Tram…

What is New in High Street?

  • The Press has an article about the Tram that was supposed to run down our end of the street.   I note that we get a mention in the comments again.  Link Here: https://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/97717158/shakeup-of-christchurch-transport-plan-proposed     I had heard a whisper that this proposal would not go ahead, so I am not surprised.  What did surprise me was that they even considered lower High Street as an option at all.  The intersection at Tuam/High Street is so crowded with signage I am not sure that the tram will fit thru!  (I think it is 28 signs).   I will grab a photo and re-do my count.   I wonder if the new stadium, or Victoria Street might be a better option for the Tram? He he!  High Street is a destination shopping zone.  I have yet to be convinced that the tram fits this classification. I know that Mr Peebles’ does not agree and his point about digging up the street after the building repairs are done is valid. CCC has left all the roading repair projects to the last-minute, it has proved to be a costly mistake.
  • Access to our frontage is a nightmare.  CCC has not responded yet.  Unfortunately they seem to have the misguided idea that we are not trading so we do not need access.  And you certainly can not get access from St Asaph Street!  (Narrow, lacks parking, multiple kerbs and channels… etc   Ho hum status normal AFU!  We have only been waiting nearly 7 years….  (Wellington has no idea what joys are waiting for them…)

This is my front door access at the moment. If I can get into the street that is.

  • Work on the demolition of 135 Begins tomorrow I believe. That will make access even more interesting. But the end result will be worth the annoyance.


Hi ho… its off to work I go…..I think i will risk my old bones on the bike… i might just be able to squeeze past to my front door…

How not to repair a Heritage Building in the Christchurch CBD…

Lower High Street gets the “Council Treatment again”.  I came to work this morning to find that our access has been cut off…….. again.  We had no prior warning.  Apparently they are trying to solve the storm water issues that have been causing grief for 3 years now…

These are photos of our current access…. I am starting to develop a persecution complex…..  What is it about coming and seeing us to warn us that is so difficult?

Ho Hummmm   …. my sale planned for last February this year is postponed again….. just so the council can park their trucks and digger in front of us during the day.

This just adds to our security issues and is not helpful to our leasing prospects.  As if they give a S…..

Case Manager??????

I am starting to get grumpy.

CCC Regeneration letter…

News Flash – Hot off the Press:

I have just opened my mail.

When I finished choking on my very nice Sauvignon blanc,  I see that the CCC has sent out a letter telling me and 30 other building owners, that we are holding up regeneration progress in the central city.  They are now going to take a “more proactive role in addressing this problem”.

Our property was identified as “warranting attention” “The Council is keen that there is timely action to resolve the issues concerning your property”.

“From 1 July 2017, normal fees and charges will become payable for the temporary use of a legal road and for traffic management”….    “If discussions between you and the council prove fruitless, the Council and its regeneration partners, LINZ and Environment Canterbury may use other tools in existing legislation to spur progress…..”.

blah blah…

“You will be assigned a case manager whose role is to help you find solutions or offer suggestions for you to pursue”.  Really after 6 plus years?

“The Council is keen to help you bring your property back into use, as this will be of benefit to the city as a whole”.

Surely you jest? this is a joke?  it took them 6 1/2 years to realise that we needed help to sort out our neighbours???  That’s why my lawyer sent LINZ a letter weeks ago, after months of futile phone calls to the CCC.  We are going to request that our neighbours are demolished.  As per the end units of the Duncan’s Buildings.

Signed Head of Urban Design, Regeneration and Heritage


Now correct me if I am wrong but we have talked to the CCC on numerous occasions trying to sort out the problems created by our neighbours..   It was futile.    I have a Resource consent, a Building consent, a traffic management plan and lord only knows what other boxes of Council paper work I have in my lounge…. and we are 3-6 weeks from finishing our toilet block/bunker development.

I have attempted to get the street cleaned up, the leaking water well in the street attended to and the parking issues addressed so my clients can park.  I failed..  mea culpa

Incidentally all of my meetings with the CCC, Regenerate and whatever else they currently call themselves, have been a waste of time, with a couple of notable exceptions. (Thank you Dave H). They leave me angry and frustrated at their lack of understanding of the issues.

I suppose I should ring them and chuck my toys out of the cot, again.  I think I will wait until I can no longer see that red haze.  Cold rage is approaching fast.

Humm, me thinks that the left hand has no idea what the right hand is doing and perhaps this is too little too late.

Bad PR!

Link to council article here: https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/newsline/show/1672

I just sold our 2nd machine today after 50 years of trading, because I got tired of waiting.

Follow up!

ho hum the Press is having some fun:

Link Here: http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/business/the-rebuild/92863275/council-goes-after-central-christchurchs-dirty-30-building-owners-who-are-kicking-the-city-in-the-face

This emotive wording is totally unhelpful.

In some cases  “Dirty 30” is totally justified.

In our case,  Totally unwarranted.  We have been badly let down by both the CCC and Linz on this issue.