Duncan’s Buildings again…..

When I finished choking on my coffee this morning, I laughed.  We make the front page again. Link Here: http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/93507270/momentum-on-dirty-30-lower-high-st-heritage-block-reopening-in-months

There are a number of Irony’s here.  Some of which will land me in trouble again…. or is that still….

The CCC Heritage Team appears to have made no attempt to save the Duncan’s Buildings at all.  In fact they have allowed the further demolition of the 2 end units that is proceeding as I type. Pix below.

At the same time the backs of 8 units in the middle section is going to be demolished shortly leaving only the frontages.

 

IMG_20170610_140954101.jpg

 

There also appears to be a disconnection between the CCC and the Heritage building owners.  What are they actually doing to help the Heritage owners?  Actually what are they doing at all?  there is only a hand full of us Heritage Owners left, now I know why…..

It has also been brought to my attention that a number of Building owners in the city, who have “Earthquake Prone Buildings”  have been given until 2047 to either repair or demolish their buildings. This I believe, includes the building next door to us.  What does the Minister of Building and Construction think he is doing????  Re-building the city one grain of sand at a time?

Really 2047?  You have to be kidding me…. So I have to wait until then before you will force my neighbor to act.  Jeepers, by that time I will be dust, so I will not care anyway!

Ho Hum, we really do need some one to advocate for us….  drat, I thought that what the Heritage team at the CCC was for?  Silly me….

Be very afraid Wellington, you could end up in the same situation I am in…

ps… No parking warden has been sighted in High Street since September 2016.  It’s a flaming shambles. We are struggling to access “our paid” for contractor parking. And I will not even bother mentioning the fact that the drains are full of leaves and blocked and that there is well water running down the footpaths/street and CCC has no interest in dealing with the issues, despite I believe 6 increasingly irritated phone calls.

The question has to asked as to why they are making it so difficult for the existing business’s in the CBD to function.  I can not explain it.

 

IMG_20170607_102032954.jpgThe Heidelberg GTO 52 zp Press inches its way to the door, on its way to a new home here in Christchurch.

 

 

Earthquake Strengthening legislation -one rule for Wellington and for us?

“The Government is using emergency powers introduced after the November 2016 quake to require the work in Wellington, Lower Hutt, and Blenheim, where there is a heightened risk of an aftershock, to force 300 building owners to strengthen within a year”.

  • “The Government announced it would foot half of each repair bill to help building owners with costs, with the “tie-back” of facades – which involves anchoring them to the main building – estimated to cost between $20,000 and $30,000″.  Christchurch has have been requesting assistance with these issues for 6 years and has been ignored. There also needs to be changes to tax legislation (strengthening needs to be tax-deductible). There needs to be a discussion on how to pay for the full strengthening needed and there also needs to be a discussion on which buildings should be “saved”.
  • “The building work will be exempt from resource and building consents, providing the work is overseen by a qualified engineer”.   We personally were held up with our strengthening for over 18 months trying to get building consent. There needs to be better communication with Council’s and a better understanding of the issues. ie fewer obstacles to strengthening.
  • “Should owners refuse to do the work, councils will have the power to undertake strengthening and recover costs from the owners, with a fine of up to $200,000 possible for continued refusal”.  Really??????   We are surrounded by damaged and  un-strengthened buildings and have been for 6 years and STILL no action is being taken. This needs to be addressed. Neighbouring building owners should not be penalised by the inaction of a few. How about the Christchurch City Council address our issues with derelict buildings?  In your dreams….

  • p1000572

Surrounded on both sides by derelict and unrepaired buildings.  The threat of a  $200,000 fine would certainly force my neighbours to make some decisions about repairing their buildings – or selling them to some one more proactive. But this decision does not apply in Christchurch…..

Forgive me for being irritated but this smacks of politics in an election year. And the irony is that none of these measures apply to Christchurch.  One rule for Wellington and no rules in Christchurch?  One could speculate as too why Wellington gets preferential treatment.  These measures are long overdue. It still does not resolve the Engineering issues, (varying strengthening methods and varying assessments standards by different Engineer’s, nor does it assist Building owners to understand what is involved in the strengthening work or give any guidance on how to proceed with it).

Building and Construction Minister Nick Smith should extend this legislation. He has not protected all Building owners equally.   I will stop while I am ahead.  This makes me incandescent with rage. (I have sent Nick Smith an email requesting that he extends the $200,000 fine’s policy to Christchurch,  I am not holding my breath.  After 6 years I would be very foolish to hold out any hope of a speedy resolution to our issues. My guess is that they will come back with the hoary old chestnut answer off oh “you do not understand the Insurance issues at play here”.  Bull s…   answer….).

It should not have taken 6 years for these issues to be addressed. And at this stage it is only in the central New Zealand region.  It needs a nation wide policy. The Powers that be are still asleep at the wheel.

Link Here: http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/nz-earthquake/88752734/new-earthquake-laws-could-force-building-owners-to-strengthen-within-a-year

Ho Hummmm… It’s a beautiful day, I think I will go and do a bit of unpaid work and go “Buggerising on Facebook” as Minister Brownlee puts it.

PS.

I sent a letter to Minister Nick Smith a few days ago requesting that fines be imposed on Christchurch Building owners who have abandoned their buildings, to the detriment of the surrounding building owners.   Copies below. I await an answer with interest.

 

From: Card Makers [mailto:mail@cardmakers.co.nz]
Sent: Friday, 27 January 2017 8:59 a.m.
To: Nick 4 Nelson
Subject: re earthquake legislation.
 
Dear Mr Smith,
 
Please extend your earthquake legislation to the Christchurch City Area, the part most in need is the ability to fine reluctant building owners.
 
 I have attached a link to my latest blog regarding this legislation,  to show you our plight.
 
https://cardmakerschc.wordpress.com/
 
 I apologise for being angry but you have ignored the situation in Christchurch for 6 years.
 
We are trapped between 2 damaged buildings  and the neighbouring building owners refuse to take action.  It has meant that we are unable to reopen our shop, we have had no wages for 6 years and our earthquake strengthening work was a pointless waste of time and money.
 
 
 Why have you not addressed this issue? Please extend the $200,000 fine for inactivity to Christchurch, as our situation is dire. And please make sure that the CCC uses this legislation.
 
Yours Sincerely
 
Nicky Arts
Christchurch
 

Reply received:  27.1.17

Dear Nicky
 
On behalf of Hon Dr Nick Smith, Minister for Building and Construction, thank you for your correspondence of January 27 2017 regarding the recent Government announcement requiring some building owners to secure unreinforced masonry parapets and facades in areas of heightened risk following the Kaikoura event.
 
Your email has been placed before the Minister and you may expect a reply in due course.
 
Kindest regards
 
Kris McGillivray | Ministerial Secretary | Office of Hon Dr Nick Smith
Minister for Building and Construction | Minister for the Environment | MP for Nelson
5.3 Executive Wing Beehive | Parliament Buildings | Wellington 6160 | New Zealand

Life in the Christchurch CBD Red Zone….

Due to the fact that the Christchurch City Council does not do any maintenance in parts of our street (ie cleaning, removing rubbish, fixing water leaks etc) in the red Zone fenced off area,  we have taken to doing our own rudimentary “street sweeping”.   It is a dirty,  wet, smelly and unhygienic mess.  We got tired of the mess being walked into our factory area!

p1010212

I wonder if we have to join the Road workers union?

Just think Wellington has all this to look forward too!

It’s a beautiful day, our consent has come through for our new toilet block and Christmas is fast approaching.

PS. As of today  some new “bicycle racks and repair station”, on the corner of High and St Asaph streets, have just been “unveiled”, for some reason this did not warrant an official ceremony, I see no sign of Gerry or Bill English! In fact I have never seen any of them in 6 years.  Could it be because it is a tragic waste of funds in a dead-end street in front of a building that has had no repairs done in 6 years.  But I would say that!

They would look amazing if the street was fixed, they are very clever, a cross between an artwork and a practical funky bike stand!

 

P1010218.jpg

 

 

Wellington edition of Shaky Town Blues, a guide to abandoned and derelict buildings. Part 191

How to survive being surrounded by derelict Buildings and Fencing in the Christchurch CBD especially written for Wellington Retailers,  How to cope with Derelict and Abandoned buildings and what to expect!

This is a survival guide for SME ‘s (Small and medium-sized enterprises) written by a building owner in the Christchurch CBD, for Wellington, Kaikoura and Blenheim retailers, based on our experience.

This follows on from a blog written in January 2015.  Building Owners Guide to Red Stickering.   Which is still very relevant.  https://cardmakerschc.wordpress.com/2015/01/28/in-memory-of-four-years-of-our-lives-lost-to-insurance-and-building-issues-in-christchurch/

After 6 years we thought we would cast some light on the inefficiency of the “Powers that be” in dealing with building abandonment issues.

First the back ground.  You are a business trying to survive and trade in a building that is surrounded by derelict buildings and fencing, in a now dead-end street.  You are the only building open in that section of street.  P1000572.JPG

Basic ground rules:

1.  Do not expect any help or assistance from anyone.   Your local Council’s will not know that you exist and Government officials ( CERA/CCDU/Regenerate/Otakaro or what ever alphabet soup they are currently using)  will be invisible.  (There will be the odd exception to this but they are few and far between, do not count on it.)

2. The fencing surrounding you will be put in place with great precision and fanfare.  That is the last time the “powers that be” will inspect it.  ( After 6 years it will be a mess and leak like a sieve. It becomes a looters magnet).

3. There will no security arrangements put in place.  Either for you or the derelict buildings. Alarm your building now.  The abandoned buildings are a “looters magnet”.

4.  There will be no infrastructure repairs done in your area, in our case for 6 years.

5. No contractor will want to work on your building. Especially if it is a Heritage Building.

6. There will be no foot traffic, for 6 years…. and still counting.

7. You will have No communication from anyone in power.  You will have no idea what is happening, remember at all times:  Say it after me:  “The powers that be” do not communicate”.

8. You will never find out who is in charge!  Think of it as a game.  Otherwise you will go insane. They will all duck for cover when you ring and they will dump your call for help as soon as they can.

9. Repeated attempts to get the other building owners to act, including the government (they purchased buildings in High Street and did nothing for 3 years ), will be ineffective and futile. Save your energy for a battle that you can win.

10.  There is no legislation in place for this situation. Otherwise I would not be writing this for you would I?
The government can fine a farmer for not wearing his helmet on a motor bike,  as a Health and Safety issue, but they can not stop a building owner from abandoning a dangerous building for 6 years.

11. There will be no mail delivery, rubbish collection or street sweeping,  for 6 years..  and counting.

12.  It is only possible to stay in your building if you have a niche customer base.  If your business relies on foot traffic close now.  It is retail suicide to stay open if you are dependent on foot traffic!  The public do not want to risk coming to your business if they feel unsafe in the area.  The Best advice I can give you is get web based as quickly as you can.  Working from home can work in certain instances, but it really is not worth the effort.  Close down and get another job.  (This is what we should have done).

13.  Do not be surprised if they close the street completely because they do not know that you are still there.  ie for road works  because they want  convenient car park.etc.

They do not know who you are and remember at all times that they do not Care, you are collateral damage and you are not important.   What did you say your name was?  Where are you from?

14.  They will lock you out of your building after every magnitude 5 quake.  They will require a Level 2 Engineers assessment before you can re-enter.  Insist that you see this assessment if you are a tenant in a building.  Also insist on seeing the DEE (Detailed Engineering Assessment).

15.  If you have to raid your own stock from a building that is abruptly closed, do so SAFELY.  Wear fluro, preferably with “Engineer” on the back,  carry a clip board, do it in broad day light.  Have spotters looking out for trouble ie any one else in fluro….  Take your accounts, wage books, grab your computer, chuck your stock in a wheelie bin. BE SAFE not reckless!  (Stock will be pillaged, looted overnight if you leave the building unattended).

Sad but true!

http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/sunday/audio/201824561/ilan-noy-the-economics-of-disasters

“Professor Ilan Noy, chair in economic disasters at Victoria University, tells Wallace why he thinks it’s a bad idea and discusses the likely economic impact of this week’s quakes”.

It is well worth listening to this!

Be prepared for the long haul and do not sweat over the small stuff.

I know that you will think that I am exaggerating, I am not and you will find that out.

P1010098